Welcome

Thank you for visiting my blog. I focus on items that I think might be of interest as well as my wonderfull family. I also feature a recipie that I hope you all will enjoy. I welcome suggestions and if anyone has anything special to share or a good recipie or two I'd love to hear from you.

Friday, February 26, 2010

What Did We Learn About H1N1?


What H1N1 taught us

Source: Los Angeles Times February 26, 2010 (ARRP Bulletin)

We have learned a lot from the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic.

We have learned, for example, that one basic assumption about pandemics was wrong: You don't need a radical mutation in a flu virus to produce a pandemic. All you need is enough change within a surface protein for a new strain to blow past acquired immunity and blaze around the world, as this one did.

And we've seen that not every pandemic strain is especially lethal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta estimated that 11,690 Americans had died of swine flu by mid-January. In a "normal" flu season, the CDC estimates that 36,000 Americans die.

As Peter Palese, an eminent flu virologist from Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, put it, "We were lucky this was a mellow virus." It lacks the virulence factors that make highly pathogenic bird flu, or the 1918 pandemic flu virus, so deadly.

In the beginning, the pandemic seemed to have an ominous affinity for the young. But this turned out to be mostly a matter of resistance. Many people born before 1957 have some cross-immunity to the virus because of their exposure to a previous H1 outbreak. So older people the usual victims of seasonal flu caught the new virus at much lower rates. And even among young people, though the attack rate was ferocious and many millions were infected, only a tiny percentage of those who got the flu died.

Another thing we've learned is that a safe, effective new flu vaccine can be produced fairly rapidly. In 1976, when 40 million people were quickly immunized against a pandemic that never came, several hundred of those receiving inoculations fell ill with Guillain-Barre paralysis, leaving Americans skeptical about fast-turnaround vaccines. This year was different.

"We've had intensive safety monitoring because of the experience with 1976," said Anne Schuchat, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, adding that "the safety record looks fantastic."

On the other hand, we have learned more about the virulence of the anti-vaccine lobby, which persuaded far too many people not to get vaccinations or even worse not to vaccinate their children. Dr. Paul Offit, chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, worries that the anti-vaccine fringe has gained the upper hand and is calling the shots on some important matters of public policy.

For example, he notes, no one in America dared put adjuvants immune-stimulating chemicals into the vaccine, a move that would have stretched the limited supply. Both Canada and Europe used the chemicals with no ill effects. In Europe, vaccine makers use the adjuvant squalene, which means that children need only one shot instead of the two required here. But say the word "squalene" and multitudes of Americans shudder: Squalene in anthrax shots has been fingered by some anti-vaccine activists as the cause of Gulf War Syndrome. That squalene is a chemical precursor to cholesterol and produced in the body every day and that you can even find it in Girl Scout cookies means nothing to them.

Though H1N1 transmission appears to be dying down, we surely haven't seen the last of this virus. Some experts, including flu virologist Michael Shaw of the CDC, fear that the virus could evolve around existing immunity, leaving the elderly vulnerable.

Perhaps the most important lesson we can still learn from this pandemic is where it came from and how we can prevent another one. Columbia University virologist Raul Rabadan, who has studied rates of mutational change in swine, bird and human flu, says that the current pandemic virus most likely emerged from a pig herd. Circumstantial evidence points to a giant, high-density pig farm in the small (3,000 people) town of La Gloria, in Veracruz, Mexico, where, according to an Associated Press report, about 450 people were diagnosed in late March with acute respiratory infections. There too the pandemic's "index case" Edgar Hernandez, a 5-year-old who first tested positive for H1N1 was identified.

Gregory Gray, a University of Florida influenza researcher, has shown in several studies that 12% to 21% of Iowa pig farmers have antibodies to H1 pig influenza viruses. His team's studies suggest that workers may pass these infections on to their families. But generally the pig viruses stop there.

This one didn't. Edgar had no contact with pigs, nor had his family. No one knows what gave this pig strain wings. Still, there must have been some point after H1N1 had jumped into people at which transmission was still sluggish, when the virus had not yet adapted to spread efficiently from person to person, when the pandemic could have been aborted. But no one was looking.

If we have any hope of stopping another pandemic, it lies in monitoring the animal-human nexus, particularly on large farms, which can function as 12 years of experience with highly pathogenic bird flu in Southeast Asia has shown us as factories for lethal disease. Packing animals together allows the evolution of virulent pathogens, as deadly germs can easily spread from one animal to its neighbor. The H5N1 bird flu never evolved the ability to transmit effectively from person to person.

But swine flus seem to adapt more quickly to human beings, perhaps because pigs and people share similar flu receptors.

We need to closely watch high-density pig farms and monitor their workers for signs of illness before another pig virus perhaps one less mellow bursts out and sweeps across the Earth again.

Wendy Orent is the author of "Plague: The Mysterious Past and Terrifying Future of the World's Most Dangerous Disease."

Monday, February 22, 2010

Can Baby Boomer Retire?

Baby boomers need to take hard look at whether they're saving enough, experts say

Source: The San Diego Union-Tribune | February 21, 2010

Roger Showley

Of course, some boomers have saved and planned well. They have already left the work force and have learned to fly an airplane or are spending time with their grandkids.

Others face a reality check that recalls Aesop's tale of the grasshopper and the ant. They played and spent and now, typically, have saved only $84,000 -- an awfully small nest egg that has to last for many years.

"The fundamental philosophy of retirement has changed," said Jason Buol, chief economist and research analyst at Private Asset Management in San Diego. "Historically, people have thought, 'Once we get into our mid-60s, we can retire and don't have to work anymore -- we'll live into our golden years forever and forever from that point on.' "

Buol, who at 33 often addresses groups of boomers 20 to 30 years older than himself, said statistics show that the elderly are living into their 90s.

"You have to take a realistic look at your financial situation -- your expenses, assets, liabilities -- and figure out, based on that information, 'Where do I stand now and where do I want to be when I make the decision to retire?' " he said.

But it isn't too late for the "Me Generation" to get things right, even if they continue to face the responsibilities of children who have boomeranged back home after college or their own parents who require an increasing level of assistance.

Luckily, with a long life span ahead of them, they can make up for financial mistakes and oversights through careful planning and strategizing -- and recover whatever losses the recession might have dealt their savings and investments.

There are some steps to take before retirement, but there's also, for some, a pot of gold on the horizon.

Count on a windfall: One thing in the boomers' favor is the thriftiness of their parents. If the "greatest generation" saved well, bought a home and paid off the mortgage in San Diego, the equity might be enough to see them through in their declining years and give you and your children a boost.

"Most of our clients don't want to count on inheritances," said financial Scott Wolters, 57. "But it is happening quite frequently."

Work longer: If you have a job, don't retire too early if you can avoid it, experts say. Demographers say many employers actually fear the departure of too many boomers, because Generation X isn't big enough to fill their shoes. Perhaps you can reduce your hours in the last year of your employment and continue to collect health benefits. If you leave your company, sometimes you can be hired back as a consultant. If you've lost your job, you can look for a new one, perhaps in a different field that plays off your personal interests. You even have time to go back to college and get a new degree or additional training in a new field.

But Buol said you might have to relocate to get a suitable job.

"Perhaps your skill set is not in demand in San Diego but perhaps is in demand in some other state, like Arizona or Nevada," Buol said. "Everybody's hurting, granted, but if you still have a usable skill set, it's something to consider about migrating to another area, and you would be able to take advantage of that."

Make a plan: Andrew J. Costanzo, 62, who recently moved his Costanzo Financial Group from Pittsburgh to Carlsbad, said planning for retirement should begin at least five years beforehand.

"I tell my clients that most people spend more time during the year planning for one week of vacation than the ultimate vacation, which is retirement," Costanzo said. "You need a road map for your retirement."

Analyze your health care coverage: Medicare kicks in for most people at age 65, but it doesn't cover all expenses. And one big one is long-term care for Alzheimer's and other debilitating afflictions.

"Health care expenses are phenomenal and I think are going to get worse," Costanzo said. "I think that is the major risk that baby boomers are going to face in the future."

With such costs currently approaching $7,000 per month for in-home nursing care, that could cost $84,000 a year -- about the same as typical boomers have saved their entire lives.

"It's pitiful," he said.

Count on Social Security: But the question for boomers is when to start collecting it. You can begin at age 62, but if you wait until 70, you might see a check for twice as much. That premium will come in handy if you live 25 years after that.

"They're going to cash in as soon as they can, unfortunately," Costanzo said of many of his clients. "It's just the way people think."

Rearrange your investments carefully: Take advantage of the catch-up provisions in 401(k)s and IRAs if you haven't set aside as much in savings plans as the law provided.

"You can increase your savings in a multitude of ways," Buol said.

You can invest part of your savings to be secure for the short term and invest the other part in growth stocks and bonds that, even if the market drops, you'll have time to recoup any losses.

"Review your account every year and rebalance it," Wolters said. "If you had 70 percent in your portfolio in stocks and 30 percent in bonds, a year later, sell 10 percent of your stocks and buy bonds." He said there are many questionnaires and scenarios available to determine what works best.

However, Costanzo said being too conservative can be fatal to long-term planning, because inflation can easily eat up a portfolio that doesn't grow with the economy.

Stay married: Sociologists and demographers report that married or partnered people live longer and prosper more than singles. In other words, don't get divorced, but if you do, get married again.

"Single people have a problem in retirement -- physically, financially," Costanzo said. "And there's also a quality-of-life standpoint. People are happier when they're with other people."

Keeping Your Bloodpresser Down...

Peel This Tropical Treat for Blood Pressure

Source Real Age

Your blood pressure could be lower just by indulging more in this sweet tropical treat: bananas.

Cheap and plentiful year-round, bananas are bursting with potassium. And a review of several major studies suggests that people who add the potassium equivalent of an extra 1 1/2 to 2 bananas to their day could drop their blood pressure 2 to 3 points.

More Points for Potassium
Dropping BP by 2 or 3 points is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to lower stroke risk. In other research, people with the highest potassium intake levels cut their stroke risk by a whopping 38 percent compared with the people who got the least potassium. This magical mineral works by encouraging your kidneys to filter more pressure-boosting sodium out of your bloodstream. It also helps tiny blood vessels relax and makes pressure sensors in artery walls function more efficiently. (Here's another sweet treat that snares high blood pressure.)

Mass A-Peel
Aim for 3,000 milligrams a day of potassium to get optimal RealAge benefits. But don't rely on pills; they can be dangerous if you have kidney problems. Go with fruits and veggies instead -- not just bananas but prunes, watermelon, baked potatoes with the skin, mushrooms, tomatoes, and other produce, too. Produce will also give you a head start on these important blood pressure control strategies:

Did you know? Nearly 90 percent of adults will develop high blood pressure by age 65. See if your blood pressure is affecting your health with this quick quiz.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Popcorn Good Snack for GI Tract......


Fortify Your GI Tract with This Midnight Munchie

Source RealAge

It's long been a favorite of midnight moviegoers, and research now shows that it could give your gastrointestinal (GI) tract the red-carpet treatment, too. It's popcorn.

An 18-year study suggests that eating a couple of servings of the stuff each week could do nice things for your colon, like reduce the risk of diverticulitis by 28 percent.

Popcorn Not a Problem?
For years, doctors have warned patients with diverticulitis to avoid popcorn, thinking that the undigestible bits could cause serious complications. This new study has many wondering if that thinking could be a little off track. But don't make any changes to your diet without talking to your doctor first. For people who do not have diverticular disease, a couple of servings of popcorn a week could be just the ticket to avoiding the painful condition down the road. Nuts also seemed to lower diverticulitis risk in the study. (Have unexplained GI problems? Find out what might be causing them with this quiz.)

More Popcorn Pros
Some of popcorn's good GI deeds may come from the inflammation-fighting lutein in the kernels, as well as the magnesium content. And eating popcorn is a great way to bump up your fiber and whole-grain intake -- two more things your GI tract loves. So go ahead, pop away! Whip up some guilt-free Cheesy Popcorn with this recipe.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

From The Real Estate Corner....

Record Number of Real Estate Licenses Revoked !!!

Due to all the recent scams on loan modifications many real estate licenses have either been surrendered or revoked by the DRE. Isn't it a same in these hard economic times that people who are just trying to save their home mortgages have been put through all of this.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

My Guadian Angel



A baby asked God, "They tell me you are sending me to earth tomorrow, but how am I going to live there being so small and helpless?" God said, "Your angel will be waiting for you and will take care of you." The child further inquired, "But tell me, here in heaven I don't have to do anything but sing and smile to be happy." God said, "Your angel will sing for you and will also smile for you. And you will feel your angel's love and be very happy." Again the small child asked, "And how am I going to be able to understand when people talk to me if I don't know the language?" God said, "Your angel will tell you the most beautiful and sweet words you will ever hear, and with much patience and care, your angel will teach you how to speak." "And what am I going to do when I want to talk to you?" God said, "Your angel will place your hands together and will teach you how to pray." "Who will protect me?" God said, "Your angel will defend you even if it means risking its life." "But I will always be sad because I will not see you anymore." God said, "Your angel will always talk to you about Me and will teach you the way to come back to Me, even though I will always be next to you." At that moment there was much peace in Heaven, but voices from Earth could be heard and the child hurriedly asked, "God, if I am to leave now, please tell me my angel's name." God said, You will simply call her, "Mom."

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Social Security Victory....

Make a Donation

A victory for the future of Social Security and Medicare

When the Senate was voting on a proposal that would have given a special fast-track debt commission the authority to propose reductions to programs like Medicare and Social Security without the opportunity for full debate and amendment by elected members of Congress, thousands of AARP advocates stood up and said, "No way!" These crucial decisions should be made with full transparency and accountability – and with the opportunity for full public debate and amendment.

And your voices were heard! The Conrad-Gregg measure failed Tuesday by a vote of 53-46. Click here to learn more.

Is Health Reform Dead?

Is health reform dead?

The fight for health care isn't over yet, but it got a lot tougher with the election results in Massachusetts last week, which leaves Senate Democrats with 59 votes – one vote shy of being able to stop a filibuster.

Both the House and Senate have passed health care bills that would stop insurance companies from turning away consumers with pre-existing conditions, place stricter limits on the premiums they can charge older Americans, and provide relief from the high cost of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries that fall into the doughnut hole.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Eat This....

'Eat This' authors offer advice for nutritious home cooking

Source: Washington Post | January 28, 2010

Every time I hear that David Zinczenko and Matt Goulding are publishing another book in their "Eat This, Not That!" series, I steel myself: Having written about several already, I'm resolved not to fall prey to their charms again.

And yet here I sit.

The fellows, editor in chief and food and nutrition editor, respectively, of Men's Health magazine, have put together another compelling volume that shows how we can all bypass the hyper-caloric, fat- , sugar- and salt-laden offerings from fast-food joints and quick-serve restaurants to make our diets more healthful and nutritious.

In past iterations, they've followed a formula, comparing a better-for-you offering (eat this) with something quite horrible (not that). In their new book, "Cook This, Not That!" (Rodale, 2009), they advise taking what for some is a drastic measure: learning to cook.

The premise is that by simply mastering a few basic but tasty recipes and substituting them for takeout or other meals prepared by others, we can seize control of what we eat, how many calories we consume and how much we spend. The authors make an excellent case for eating in: In the time it takes for a pizza or some Chinese food to be delivered or for the family to pile into the car and drive to a restaurant, any of us can cook a delicious, satisfying and nutritious meal in our kitchen.

The book features more than 200 recipes, each illustrated with a full-page color photo and contrasted with a restaurant favorite. None takes more than 20 or 30 minutes to cook. The Spinach Salad With Warm Bacon Dressing, with 220 calories, 11 grams of fat (three of them saturated) and 560 milligrams of sodium per serving, is offered as a substitute for the Grilled Shrimp 'N Spinach Salad from Applebee's, which delivers 1,040 calories, 11 grams of saturated fat and 2,380 milligrams of sodium (more than the government's dietary guidelines budgets for a full day).

Some features of "Cook This, Not That!" are aimed at the reluctant or novice cook: There's a chapter with a guide to outfitting a kitchen for just $331, for instance. But because Goulding was a professional chef before he joined Men's Health, he's made these recipes worthwhile for more-seasoned cooks, too. One example: a more healthful version of chicken fried rice than the kind you'd get at P.F. Chang's, which at the time the book was written contained an ungodly 4,548 milligrams of sodium. (The restaurant chain apparently has since reduced the dish's sodium content.) The homemade version has 720 milligrams.

One thing I love about the "Cook This" approach is its emphasis on fresh, whole ingredients and its embrace of delicious items (such as the bacon in that spinach salad) that many diet and nutrition guides would consider off-limits.

"We're all about honest, simple food," the authors write. "And we're not afraid to use the real ingredients delicious food demands." They eschew light mayonnaise, Splenda, fat-free half-and-half and "sneaky tricks like folding pureed broccoli into your brownies, using Fiber One cereal as breading, or replacing butter with applesauce in the chocolate cookies."

See why I like these books so much?

Like the others in the series, this book is packed with handy tips (top your pancakes with easy-to-make fruit compote instead of maple syrup) and graphic guides to selecting the best foods, from meats and dairy products to pantry staples. And it isn't afraid to play favorites: Breyers All Natural ice cream is singled out as the "go-to brand for all your ice cream needs" because milk, rather than cream, is the first ingredient; it thus has fewer calories and fat than other brands.

"The first six books were telling people how to make smart choices when in a compromising position," Goulding told me over the phone. "They were about mitigating damage" when your only dining option is the food court.

The new book, he said, is "not about cutting out foods you really love, but about learning to produce them in an environment in which you're in control." That control lets you take charge of how much butter, salt and sugar you consume, said Goulding.

So, do the authors practice what they preach? Zinczenko said via e-mail, "I cook occasionally, but not as much as Matt." Goulding said that, even with his busy schedule, he tries to cook dinner five nights a week.

But even those who feel they can't manage that frequency can improve their diets by just cooking more often. "You'd have to try very hard," he said, "not to do better than what restaurants do for you day in and day out."

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Democrats Ponder Health Care.....


Democrats ponder health care tweaks to appease House
Source: Boston Globe January 26, 2010
Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
WASHINGTON - Seeking to salvage a health care overhaul, congressional leaders are considering a plan to pass the Senate bill with some changes to accommodate House Democrats, senior Democratic aides said yesterday.
Leaders will present the idea to the rank and file this week, but it is unclear whether they have enough votes to carry it out.
Last week’s victory by Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts cost Democrats the 60th vote they need to maintain undisputed control of the Senate, jeopardizing the outcome of the health care bill just as President Obama had brokered a final deal on most of the major issues.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, said last week she does not have the votes to pass the Senate bill without changes. Democratic congressional aides, speaking on condition of anonymity because the issue is in flux, said the latest strategy involves using a special budget procedure to revise the Senate bill. The procedural route - known as reconciliation - would allow a majority of 51 senators to amend their bill to address some of the major substantive concerns raised by the House. That would circumvent the 60-vote majority needed to hold off Republican stall tactics.
Only changes that affect taxes and government spending would normally be allowed to pass with a majority of 51 senators. It is unclear that other major disputes - for example, how to restrict taxpayer funding for abortions - could be settled similarly.
The new strategy is politically risky. There is widespread support for Obama’s goals of expanding coverage to nearly all Americans while trying to slow costs. But polls show the public is deeply skeptical of the Democratic bills, and Republicans would accuse Democrats of ignoring voters’ wishes.
Obama initially voiced doubts last week that a comprehensive bill was still viable, but he now seems to be pushing for it. Asked yesterday if the president was backing away from his pursuit of major changes, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs responded: “No.’’
“I think the president believes that the circumstances that led him to undertake greater security for people in their health care . . . existed last year, last week, and this week,’’ Gibbs said.
Among those arguing for a quick strike on health care is David Plouffe, the political adviser who helped elect Obama president and has just been summoned back by the White House to help in this year’s elections.
“I know that the short-term politics are bad,’’ Plouffe argued in a Washington Post op-ed. “But politically speaking, if we do not pass it, the GOP will continue attacking the plan as if we did anyway, and voters will have no ability to measure its upside.’’

Yea!! Isla is 9 months old

Doggie slideshow